Showing posts with label Cambodian Living Arts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cambodian Living Arts. Show all posts

Saturday, April 6, 2013

Sopheap Pich and Cambodian Contemporary Art

This past weekend I went to the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York to visit the Sopheap Pich exhibit there. The exhibit was mostly empty compared to the more popular "Impressionism, Fashion, and Modernity," which although was excellently well done, deserves the same attention as Pich (I guess that's non-Western art's popularity for you). The exhibit is part of the "Season of Cambodia" exhibit in New York that showcases visual and performing arts from Cambodia in New York City. The  festival is sponsored by Arn Chorn-Pond and his organization Cambodian Living Arts (formerly called The Cambodian Masters Performers Program) as well as New York art institutions in general (for example, the Met and the MoMa). 

What I find most intriguing is that Chorn-Pond is Cambodian but also American, similar with Pich. These artists are Cambodian but have opportunities given to them by being American citizens as well. Being American has provided them, oftentimes, with the financial means to become full-time artists.  Moreover, perhaps maintaing the victimhood of the Khmer Rouge opens up more doors and possibilities for art exhibits. It is in their best interest to maintain victimhood regardless of Chorn-Pond claiming that he wants to make Cambodia not "known for [the] killing fields or political conflicts." Although I do not want to think cynically about Cambodia's amazing and burgeoning contemporary arts scene, I cannot help but wonder about this potential and likely "victimhood" concept.

Born in 1971, Sopheap Pich grew up in Battambang before moving to the United States in 1984 after the Khmer Rouge genocide in 1984. He went to University of Massachusetts Amherst and mostly painted before switching to sculpture in 2004. The vast majority of his sculptures are very large and are made with bamboo and rattan (type of palm) secured with wire. He takes inspiration from "human anatomy and nature,""free circulation," and overall the "shapes in [the] environment."


A slightly illegal picture of "Cycle." All of the photos in
this post are taken by yours truly hiding from the Met guards.
The first piece in room 209 at the Met is called "Cycle," built in 2011, depicting two stomach organs connected together to "invoke bonding or pairing." This sculpture for him invokes the "anonymity of organs, essential to life yet without identity and thus able to assume universality." This conjures up the idea that behind the face, everyone is the same, giving a symbol of anti-racism, anti-hate, etc. As a survivor of genocide, these emotions surely are very apparent in Pich's life and emotions. The abstract stomach shapes for Pich show an "[openness] to possibility."


"Morning Glory"
The next piece was titled "Morning Glory" (2011) and was beautifully spread across the floor of the gallery.  Unlike our morning glory flowers in the United States, Cambodian "morning glories" refer to an edible herb often also called "swamp cabbage." Morning glories, Pich describes in the sculpture's caption, were the second most important source of nourishment after rice during the Khmer Rouge. Pich describes his surprise that they are still popular in Cambodian cuisine as they are the "lowest on the culinary scale" in his mind (that being said, rice was and still is the most important grain in Cambodian society).

"Ratanakiri Valley Drip" (2012) was inspired from his sadness that northern Cambodia is now barren land--stripped of its timber and resources due to greed. When Ratanakiri Province was described to him, he writes in the caption, it was a land of lushness with local villages, but when Pich went to see the region for himself, he found all of this gone from the villagers desperation for financial income. This immediately relates to the (mostly illegal) deforestation still happening in Cambodia presently.  


"Upstream"
His piece "Upstream" (2005) depicted, on a larger and more grand scale, the fish traps that his father made during the Khmer Rouge to catch food (mainly frogs). The nets are supposed to elicit the idea of a border crossing or barrier (a reoccurring theme in the genocide with the Thai border holding refugee camps and the Vietnam border where U.S. soldiers dropped B-52s).

"Junk Nutrients," constructed in 2009, shows an intestine with trash collected from the Beng Kok River outside of his studio close to Phnom Penh, Cambodia's capital city. His intentions were to show pollution, both literally (from the trash) and metaphorically. He describes pollution of the mind through media and body from the numerous chemicals in food--likely hinting to distaste for the Asian Green Revolution. What I found most intriguing was Pich stating that he disliked the "numbing effect of tradition and culture" in the caption. I believe that most likely, Pich wants to break free from the common western attitude that Asian arts should be more "oriental-esque" à la Japanese calligraphy, for example, and not modern sculptures. Indeed, Pich himself is breaking free of the typical Angkor architecture associated with Cambodia. Regardless, Pich should realize (and likely does) that these "traditional" art forms are what Cambodia is still mostly known for and what makes the country internationally renowned and recognized.

Thursday, March 28, 2013

Cambodian Traditional Music: A Revival

This week I watched the 2003 PBS documentary The Flute Player (conveniently available on Hulu) in preparation for the "Season of Cambodia" arts festival. The Season of Cambodian arts festival is happening throughout April and May in New York with multiple exhibits and talks throughout the city. The film gave a good background on the arts in Cambodia, and notably how Pol Pot stifled arts and culture during the Khmer Rouge and through the Cambodian Civil War. The Khmer Rouge (and multiple other dictatorships) targeted artists because they employed great amounts of self-expression--directly against the Rouge's dogma. The Cambodian Master Performers Program (now called Cambodian Living Arts) is attempting to revive Khmer art and culture, namely music, and make Cambodia not "known for [the] killing fields or political conflicts" but rather "arts and culture" as an "international signature" (Arn Chorn-Pond in The Flute Player).

Arn Chorn-Pond at a Thai
refugee camp.
Arn Chorn-Pond is the son of an opera performer and opera house owner--and was nine years old when the Khmer Rouge took over. He was forced into a labor camp, but when the Khmer Rouge wanted to create a music group spreading their propaganda, he was able to play the flute and save himself. He still feels immense "survivor's guilt" and to mitigate this, he teaches Cambodian children music at a school in Lowell, Massachusetts as well as founded the Cambodian Master Performers Program.

In The Flute Player, he goes to Cambodia to find former artists that were suppressed by the Khmer Rouge, interviews them, and records their music. He does this with a total of five artists in the film: Kung Nai, Chek Mach, Yim Saing, Nong Chok, and Youn Mek. He meets with Kung Nai (below), known as the "Cambodian Ray Charles" for his blues style music and the fact that he is blind. He plays the chapei dong veng, or a guitar-like instrument. During the Khmer Rouge, Nai was forced to sing about the landowning class and capitalist exploitation, and although he did not agree with this, it kept him from being killed like so many other artists. After the Khmer Rouge, he continued singing non-controversial songs for fear that they would reemerge from the forests, where many of the former soldiers and commanders lived after Vietnamese liberation in 1979. Today, he sings in Cambodia and around the world.

Chorn-Pond also interviews Chek Mach, a famous opera singer in Cambodia before the Khmer Rouge. She claims that during the Khmer Rouge she would lay low in the rice fields with a basket on top of her head and walk from village to village singing. The people would give her food for her voice, ranging from bananas to MSG, she said (I like to believe this but am honestly skeptical). Most heart-wrenching was when Chorn-Pond reunitied with his flute teacher, Youn Mek, that he met in 1977 and taught him for the remainder of the Khmer Rouge. Mek thanks Chorn-Pond for sharing his food and keeping him alive (Chorn-Pond said that, along with not having to work in the rice fields, the Khmer Rouge gave him more food than the other children). The interviews combined with the music and Chorn-Pond's honest and raw emotions about the genocide makes the film very touching.

Chek Mach and Arn Chorn-Pond in
1999.
Ultimately the film proves that it is important to see Cambodia outside of a corruption-ridden and post-genocide context. Although a vital part of Cambodian history and a socio-demographic indicator, the Khmer Rouge history does not need to wholly define Cambodia and its people. Instead, the art forms emerging from this time can showcase Cambodia's rich culture that begin to move past genocide. The arts give more creative expression to the Cambodian people allowing them to define their agency in a world that still views their country as a Shangri-la-turned-death-camp.

While Chorn-Pond focuses on more traditional music, next week I will looking Cambodia's burgeoning contemporary art scene, going to Sopheap Pich's "Cambodia Rattan" exhibit at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, as well as the "Bomb Ponds" exhibition at the Asia Society Museum (the latter if I have got the time!).

Works Cited:
The Flute Player. Glatzer, Jocelyn Dir. PBS, 2003. Film

Embedded video taken from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PukOTKXs3bQ.